When do I have to have finished my PhD by to be eligible for the 2022 cohort application and selection process?
Candidates applying for our 2022 cohort must have completed, or expect to complete, all the requirements for the conferral of their PhD, including a successful defense, between 01 June 2021 and 30 July 2022. It is worth noting that you do not necessarily have to have attended your graduation ceremony, so long as all requirements for conferral of doctoral status have been met within this timeframe.
Do I need to be nominated by my institution?
Yes, nominated candidates will be issued an authorization code by their nominating university to enable them to access the online application portal. We do not accept self-nominations or have an open route for applications.
Can I apply next year?
You may be able to apply in a future year if you are eligible for that year’s intake (for 2023 this will mean your PhD is awarded between 01 June 2022 and 30 July 2023) and your awarding institution agrees to nominate you as a candidate.
Is there any preference for the disciplines in which candidates should complete in their PhD or for Fellows to conduct their Placement research?
Candidates may have conducted their graduate degree in any of the natural sciences (Astronomy, Biology, Chemistry, Physics, and Earth Sciences), Engineering, Mathematics, or Computing, including all sub-disciplines within these and may pivot to any other STEM discipline they choose. While they must have done their PhD in a STEM discipline, they may pivot to a social science field during their pivot if they can make a strong argument that doing so would help advance scientific discovery.
Can we edit our Preliminary Information during the application?
Yes, but we recommend you do not alter fields such as your PhD discipline after 01 July 2021 unless absolutely necessary as we collect this data at that time and use this to help determine the overall composition of our Academic Review panels.
Are there word or page limits within the application?
Yes, word and page limits are clearly communicated both in the online application form and in the associated guidance notes, please pay close attention to these.
Can you provide me with an example of a good application to use as a template?
We do not provide examples of ‘good’ applications because the best application for you is the one that is personal to you and your scientific objectives. Your application should be your own work, be personal to you, and reflect your achievements and future plans. Applications based on other candidates’ applications or applications from previous years will not stand out during the review process and you may inadvertently fail to address requirements specific to this year’s process.
Can I update my application (e.g., my publications or CV.) after I have submitted it?
No, we do not permit updates to any part of the application post-submission. We strongly recommend you leave yourself enough time to thoroughly review and check your application before submitting it. Do not leave it to the last day.
Can I pivot into the Social Sciences?
We encourage Schmidt Science Fellows to think broadly, deeply, and globally about where they undertake their Fellowship Placements. Fellows may undertake their Placements in any laboratory that aligns with the program vision and the individual training needs of the Fellow. We do not encourage pivots into particular research areas or impose boundaries in this regard. The program aims to advance scientific discovery through interdisciplinary research and training, so an argument will need to be made for how a pivot into any discipline will facilitate that scientific advancement.
Does the pivot need to make an impact on society (e.g., solving real-life problems in current situations) or can it just satisfy academic curiosity?
We support bold ideas and that includes fundamental blue-skies academic research as well as applied research. In either case, we recommend you also articulate a vision as to how the proposal may have an impact, in both the short and longer-term, be that in science and/ or society.
On the application itself, can the fundamental problem being addressed be the same as my PhD studies, but the pivot be a technical one to learn a new set of skills to apply to the same problem?
Yes, you may pivot to learn a new skill set that opens up a new set of approaches to contribute to a similar problem you addressed in your PhD studies (e.g., cancer, global warming, etc.). However, the new skill set should be explicitly from another discipline.
How much of an expert should I be in my new field of study?
You do not have to be an expert in the field you are pivoting into, but you should have researched the area sufficiently well to be able to propose a technically feasible proposal. We expect you to develop expertise in the new discipline during your Fellowship. We do not set expectations regarding the success of your project or scientific outputs. Schmidt Science Fellows gives you the freedom to make an ambitious leap, and to fail, but the ambition should be tempered with a clarity of vision for the purpose of making this leap and a thorough investigation into the feasibility of making the attempt.
I have already started working on my pivot is that OK? How significant of a pivot should we make from our PhD studies? Is it best to implement a piece of our PhD studies in a new field, or should it be entirely different?
Linear or incremental extensions of your PhD studies are unlikely to be considered ambitious enough, we advise that there should at the very least be a new skill set to be learned through the pivot you are making. You should be feeling uncomfortable about what you don’t know in the new area. If you have already mastered the majority of skills needed to undertake your Fellowship research proposal then you are probably not suggesting a strong enough pivot.
How novel should the proposal be?
We encourage ambition, innovation, and bold ideas. Research proposals that are wholly derivative or that duplicate existing ideas are unlikely to be competitive.
Can we make changes to the proposal that we have already submitted to our nominating institution?
Yes, please approach the online application as a new exercise and ensure you address the requirements (and pay attention to the guidance notes) therein. You may draw on your university proposal (if your university requested one), but each nominating institution is likely to have a different internal process, and these do not take precedence over the requirements of our online application.
How can you balance 'big ideas' with a 12–24 month research proposal? What if my idea is more ambitious than that?
We suggest you consider the Fellowship and 12-24 month research proposal as part of the bigger picture, there is no expectation for you to single-handedly solve grand societal challenges within this timeframe. We recommend you focus your research proposal on the 12-24 month period and consider its technical feasibility within that timeframe, but to think of this as part of a longer-term vision. It is worth articulating how the focused learnings you will gain through this period of intensive study will contribute to both your personal/ research goals after the Fellowship as well as commenting on the potential for wider impact in science and society.
How bound and committed are we to the project we propose in our application?
You are not expected to commit to the proposal before the award of a Fellowship.
The research proposal itself is subject to discussion, mentoring, and review before the Fellowship commences – we accept that the science may have moved on since your application and also that further mentoring and discussion may reshape things.
I have more than one potential research project in mind, should I write about all of them or just focus on one?
You should focus on creating a single clear Fellowship research proposal. We are looking for Fellows to pivot into another discipline and go through an intense period of learning to embed themselves fully in a new research area.
Is it ill-advised to mention why I’m pivoting away from my current field? e.g. frustrations regarding our current research or supervisor.
You should give a clear and positive scientific rationale regarding why you want to make the pivot you are proposing, what impact and benefits this will have and why you are passionate about this. Focusing solely on a current negative situation as a reason for making a change is unlikely to make for a convincing rationale.
I already have a post-doctoral position lined up, is this a problem?
We recognize that some candidates will already have started post-docs. However, candidates should not assume that any pre-existing position will be automatically approved or that it will be automatically denied. Rather, it will be subject to the same review and approval process as a new and not yet started position.
The placement process is entirely focused on making sure that you find the best lab in which to achieve your ambitious Fellowship goals. We recommend you keep your options open and have a flexible mindset about where you may eventually carry out your Fellowship Research Placement.
Can you choose to be placed at a non-academic institution for your postdoc?
Majority of placements are hosted by academic institutions. However, Fellows have done post-docs at non-academic institutions like National Laboratories. In these instances, Fellows are required to have an academic affiliation if they are placed at a non-academic institution (to ensure access to an appropriate and supportive scientific community and help maintain a breadth of longer-term career options). All placements, regardless of being at academic or non-academic institutions must be discussed with and approved by the Academic Council who will be ensuring that the environment you select is the best possible one for your research, pivot, and professional development.
Can I do my Fellowship placement in the lab where I am currently studying for my PhD?
No. Selected Fellows are required to pursue a Fellowship Research Placement in a different lab to that of their PhD. Candidates should view a potential Fellowship Research Placement as an unrivaled opportunity to go anywhere in the world to acquire new skills in a new discipline and to experience a different research environment. We encourage you to think broadly and globally about this and how this may enable both your current project and future career and to make the most of this opportunity.
How do I identify potential labs, and do I need to reach out to potential PIs?
We recommend you investigate which labs and organizations are generating interesting outputs and publications in the area you wish to move into in the first instance. We recommend you also look into how the lab is structured and the track record of the PI to see if you think they could provide the training and resources you would need and if you feel you would ‘fit’. You do not need to secure a position at this stage or contact potential PIs, but you may do so if you wish. This will not affect your application. You are not expected to join or commit to any one option before the award of a Fellowship. Indeed, it is advised that you wait if you can, to have the full benefit of the mentoring of our Academic Council.
In my application, should I mention past outreach and advocacy activities, or my vision for this in the future?
Yes, if relevant to you, this type of content is well worth mentioning in your Personal Statement.
Who should I ask to write my letters of recommendation? Can a group leader of a potential laboratory where I would like to carry out my research be a referee? What about someone who could only write a personal recommendation?
We ask for three-five letters of recommendation. We recommend you select a range of referees and ideally choose people with enough experience and perspective to talk to both your current abilities (academic and character) AND your future potential. You do not need to have secured a post-doctoral position for your placement at this time, so think carefully about how well a potential future group leader really knows you before asking someone in this role to write a letter for you.
What is the expectation regarding the number and quality of publications?
There is no one simple answer to this as outputs vary significantly between disciplines, as does the impact factor of journals associated with different subject areas. Our Academic Review is carried out by experts in different disciplinary areas and will take this into account. However, we are seeking academic excellence and you should be able to evidence a clear record of achievement and productivity relative to your field of study.
Are submitted/under-review papers able to be included in the application? What about other kinds of output?
Yes, you may include three types of publications ‘Published’, ‘In-Press’ and ‘In-Preparation’. You may also include Patents, Book Chapters, etc. in the Other Outputs section of the application form.
How does the Academic Review work? Are there interviews?
There are no interviews for the Academic Review process. At this stage of the process, a review panel of three-five senior academics (all broadly expert in the area of your PhD research area) review your application materials independently ahead of convening as a panel to discuss each application and to arrive at a consensus set of recommendations and rankings.
Will Final interviews be in person?
No, we intend to run interviews virtually as we have successfully done so over the past two cycles.